The rush to judgment is so predictable nowadays, and so are the apologists who rush to defend men from mounting accusations. There has to be a middle ground between "Cancel him!" and "Men's rights!" I think thoughtful people can balance the principle of innocent-until-proven-guilty with the reality that if multiple women are credibly accusing a man of bad behavior, there's probably something there. But can we as a society take a nuanced position like that? Apparently not.
The rush to judgment is so predictable nowadays, and so are the apologists who rush to defend men from mounting accusations. There has to be a middle ground between "Cancel him!" and "Men's rights!" I think thoughtful people can balance the principle of innocent-until-proven-guilty with the reality that if multiple women are credibly accusing a man of bad behavior, there's probably something there. But can we as a society take a nuanced position like that? Apparently not.
Shows how Big Tech works day1
IE online censorship
as far as im concerned rittenhouse got away with murder
I doubt you watched the trial, then. It was unarguably self-defense.